The other day I posted about my pursuit of Samuel Rhoades/Rhodes and Ida May Dewey. I mentioned the marriage record I expected to find. Today I made it to the Jacksonville Public Library and examined the LDS film I had ordered.
I found them. Samuel Henston Rhoads, as his name appears on the marriage record, and Ida May Dewey married on 5 September 1881, the ceremony conducted by a Justice of the Peace, Thomas Lambert. This took place in Pike County, Ohio, and is recorded in the Probate Court in Marriage Book Volume 4, page 36. There is not a lot of information in the record -- no parents' names, for example. The record does say that the groom was over 21 years of age and the bride over 18, and that they were no nearer in relation than second cousins, and that there was no impediment to the marriage.
It just does not seem to have lasted terribly long. I wish I could go to Ohio, because the answers to the riddles posed by Samuel Henston Rhoads probably are there. I'll still be working on running him down. Stay tuned.
.
Karen LeSueur Packard Rhodes's musings about genealogy, including recent developments, methods and sources, her own family history, and whatever is and can be related to them.
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
On the Trail of Samuel Rhoades/Rhodes
There is a family legend in my husband's family about his grandfather, Andrew Lewis Rhodes. The tale goes that sometime in the late 1880s or early 1890s, Andrew and his brother Harley were placed in an orphanage by their mother, Ida M. (Dewey) Rhoades/Rhodes. The variations in the spelling of the surname are "explained" in this story, which relates that Andrew was not a good speller as a little boy, and he wrote his name "Rhodes" rather than "Rhoades" upon entering the orphanage. Why the boys were placed in the institution -- located somewhere around Chillicothe, Ohio -- is not revealed in the tale.
The bit about the name spelling seems a bit specious, for a couple of reasons. It is unlikely the child would have signed himself into the orphanage; his mother would have done that. I have no idea what sort of speller Ida was. The second reason this portion of the tale, at least, seems bogus is that in Andrew Lewis Rhodes's Railroad Retirement file, he spells his father's name as "Rhoades" on one document, and "Rhodes" on another. If he was a poor speller as a child, he did not lose the habit as an adult! His own name, however, he consistently signed as "Rhodes."
The photograph at right was found among Andrew Rhodes's effects. I found it in Andrew's wallet, which we had in a box of other items. On the back, Andrew identified the seated man as his father, Samuel. The man standing next to him, with his hand on Samuel's shoulder, is unidentified. To me, they appear a couple of rough-looking characters. I cannot determine what the light patch on the standing man's hat is, but I wonder if it was not a police badge or a Pinkerton badge. I have not been able to find out anything about the circumstances under which this photo was taken. Were they both cops or private security? Was the standing man a cop, and is that the hand of an arresting officer on Samuel's shoulder?
This could have a bearing on why the boys were placed in the orphanage. Ida Dewey Rhoades/Rhodes was apparently alone at that time, with no means of support, and put the boys in the orphanage so they could be cared for. She subsequently remarried, and Harley, at age 15, is with Ida and her second husband and their own three children, in the 1900 census. Andrew, who would have been 18 in 1900, has so far not been located in that census,
Andrew, in his Railroad Retirement file, lists his birthplace as Pike County, Ohio. In an earlier census, 1870, there is a Samuel Rhoades in the home of his father Levi Rhoades, and not far from this household is a Dewey family with a daughter, Ida M. My thought is that this is probably Andrew's parents as youngsters. I need to corroborate that, but have not yet found, for instance, a birth record for Andrew. It is the right county, however. I also am on the track o a marriage certificate for a Samuel H. Rhoades and Ida Mary [sic] Dewey, recorded in the Pike County records as microfilmed by the LDS church. The film is waiting for me at the Jacksonville Public Library, but I have not yet, due to illness, got a chance to view it. Again, it is the right county, and the right time frame.
Harley Rhoades died in Florida in 1947. I have found him and his wife in a couple of city directories, as well as seeing his death listed in the Florida death index. Andrew came to Florida as well, and married in Lakeland. Later, he came to Jacksonville in the course of his work as a Pullman conductor, and died there in 1966.
Though the trail is obscure, I feel that I am on the track of Samuel H. Rhoades/Rhodes, and will lay him to heel one of these days -- perhaps as the standing man in the photo did so long ago. That is a story I really want to uncover!
.
The bit about the name spelling seems a bit specious, for a couple of reasons. It is unlikely the child would have signed himself into the orphanage; his mother would have done that. I have no idea what sort of speller Ida was. The second reason this portion of the tale, at least, seems bogus is that in Andrew Lewis Rhodes's Railroad Retirement file, he spells his father's name as "Rhoades" on one document, and "Rhodes" on another. If he was a poor speller as a child, he did not lose the habit as an adult! His own name, however, he consistently signed as "Rhodes."
The photograph at right was found among Andrew Rhodes's effects. I found it in Andrew's wallet, which we had in a box of other items. On the back, Andrew identified the seated man as his father, Samuel. The man standing next to him, with his hand on Samuel's shoulder, is unidentified. To me, they appear a couple of rough-looking characters. I cannot determine what the light patch on the standing man's hat is, but I wonder if it was not a police badge or a Pinkerton badge. I have not been able to find out anything about the circumstances under which this photo was taken. Were they both cops or private security? Was the standing man a cop, and is that the hand of an arresting officer on Samuel's shoulder?
This could have a bearing on why the boys were placed in the orphanage. Ida Dewey Rhoades/Rhodes was apparently alone at that time, with no means of support, and put the boys in the orphanage so they could be cared for. She subsequently remarried, and Harley, at age 15, is with Ida and her second husband and their own three children, in the 1900 census. Andrew, who would have been 18 in 1900, has so far not been located in that census,
Andrew, in his Railroad Retirement file, lists his birthplace as Pike County, Ohio. In an earlier census, 1870, there is a Samuel Rhoades in the home of his father Levi Rhoades, and not far from this household is a Dewey family with a daughter, Ida M. My thought is that this is probably Andrew's parents as youngsters. I need to corroborate that, but have not yet found, for instance, a birth record for Andrew. It is the right county, however. I also am on the track o a marriage certificate for a Samuel H. Rhoades and Ida Mary [sic] Dewey, recorded in the Pike County records as microfilmed by the LDS church. The film is waiting for me at the Jacksonville Public Library, but I have not yet, due to illness, got a chance to view it. Again, it is the right county, and the right time frame.
Harley Rhoades died in Florida in 1947. I have found him and his wife in a couple of city directories, as well as seeing his death listed in the Florida death index. Andrew came to Florida as well, and married in Lakeland. Later, he came to Jacksonville in the course of his work as a Pullman conductor, and died there in 1966.
Though the trail is obscure, I feel that I am on the track of Samuel H. Rhoades/Rhodes, and will lay him to heel one of these days -- perhaps as the standing man in the photo did so long ago. That is a story I really want to uncover!
.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Careers in Genealogy: My Own Humble Path
I just read Amy Coffin's "We Tree" entry about careers in genealogy, and her take on the subject. Here's mine:
I have chosen to speak and write. I do not make much money at it because, due to my health, I cannot work at it full time. I do as much as I can, while getting the rest I need and while dealing with the occasional difficulties my health status tosses me. So I'm a part-timer.
I chose speaking and writing because I enjoy talking about the subject, yet I am also very much a loner. I enjoy solitude. I just love sitting in a library or archive, tracking down genealogical or historical facts. I also enjoy the process of writing -- taking all those facts and weaving them into a coherent whole. I very much enjoyed putting together my last book, Non-Federal Censuses of Florida, 1784-1945: A Guide to Sources. And now that the grant period is over, and all I need to do now is get an article written for the university's scholarly journal, the "project" concerning St. Augustine during the Second Spanish Period is no longer the "project." It is the "book."
I write in a field that is not exactly known for blockbuster best-sellers, and I write about "niche" subjects within that small sphere. That is all right with me. I have made enough to further my education, picking up skills and knowledge which will make me more effective working on this particular book about St. Augustine, as well as further researches I plan on the colonial Spanish lineages and history of Florida. And I hope that by presenting this examination of the families of St. Augustine, using a genealogical as well as historical approach, under the auspices of a university grant, I will have made my little tiny contribution toward bringing genealogy to its rightful place in the academy as one of the social sciences. I agree with Amy, that great days are in store for genealogy. I think recognition as an academic discipline will be one of those great things.
I am fortunate in that my husband has a retirement which, while not allowing us to be in any way extravagant, allows us to be comfortable. I do not have to work to live. I speak and write on genealogical/historical subjects because I enjoy it and because I do want to make some contribution to the field. Each of us, doing our little bit and putting our one little brick into the walls, will help construct a fine edifice of genealogical knowledge.
I have chosen to speak and write. I do not make much money at it because, due to my health, I cannot work at it full time. I do as much as I can, while getting the rest I need and while dealing with the occasional difficulties my health status tosses me. So I'm a part-timer.
I chose speaking and writing because I enjoy talking about the subject, yet I am also very much a loner. I enjoy solitude. I just love sitting in a library or archive, tracking down genealogical or historical facts. I also enjoy the process of writing -- taking all those facts and weaving them into a coherent whole. I very much enjoyed putting together my last book, Non-Federal Censuses of Florida, 1784-1945: A Guide to Sources. And now that the grant period is over, and all I need to do now is get an article written for the university's scholarly journal, the "project" concerning St. Augustine during the Second Spanish Period is no longer the "project." It is the "book."
I write in a field that is not exactly known for blockbuster best-sellers, and I write about "niche" subjects within that small sphere. That is all right with me. I have made enough to further my education, picking up skills and knowledge which will make me more effective working on this particular book about St. Augustine, as well as further researches I plan on the colonial Spanish lineages and history of Florida. And I hope that by presenting this examination of the families of St. Augustine, using a genealogical as well as historical approach, under the auspices of a university grant, I will have made my little tiny contribution toward bringing genealogy to its rightful place in the academy as one of the social sciences. I agree with Amy, that great days are in store for genealogy. I think recognition as an academic discipline will be one of those great things.
I am fortunate in that my husband has a retirement which, while not allowing us to be in any way extravagant, allows us to be comfortable. I do not have to work to live. I speak and write on genealogical/historical subjects because I enjoy it and because I do want to make some contribution to the field. Each of us, doing our little bit and putting our one little brick into the walls, will help construct a fine edifice of genealogical knowledge.
Monday, April 11, 2011
Bill West's Civil War Genealogy Challenge
Bill West, whose blog is West in New England, has offered a challenge for 12 April 2011, which is the 150th anniversary of the start of the Civil War. Have you noticed that on the television, they're repeating Ken Burns's "The Civil War," and programs about the assassination of Abraham Lincoln?
Bill asks us to blog about our Civil War ancestors. I have mentioned before my maternal great-great grandfather Charles Reed and my paternal great-great grandfather Matthew Hale Packard. Charles Reed served in a regiment of Indiana infantry, and Matthew Hale Packard in two different regiments of New York cavalry. By profession, Charles Reed was a nineteenth-century jack of all trades, having been a miller, a teacher, and an inventor. Matthew Hale Packard was a carpenter.
Having talked about their service before, tonight I'm going to talk about how the Civil War left them. Both suffered from afflictions common to soldiers during the Civil War, a war in which there were more casualties from disease than from combat. Charles Reed survived with chronic dysentery and all the afflictions that may accompany it, until 1920. He suffered pain and discomfort almost every day of that period of time. When he did die, it was in poverty and as a widow. His daughter Carrie Alice had taken care of him in his final years.
Matthew Hale Packard likewise suffered from chronic illnesses after the war. He did not last as long as Charles Reed, dying in 1881. Both of them were eventually left unable to work. Matthew Hale Packard's wife Emily Hoyt was able to earn a living as a milliner.
Aside from being the date of the start of the Civil War, April 12 is also the day the Russians launched Yuri Gagarin into space in 1961. It is also the day Franklin Delano Roosevelt died in 1945. I try to find something positive in the day, because April 12 is also my birthday.
.
Bill asks us to blog about our Civil War ancestors. I have mentioned before my maternal great-great grandfather Charles Reed and my paternal great-great grandfather Matthew Hale Packard. Charles Reed served in a regiment of Indiana infantry, and Matthew Hale Packard in two different regiments of New York cavalry. By profession, Charles Reed was a nineteenth-century jack of all trades, having been a miller, a teacher, and an inventor. Matthew Hale Packard was a carpenter.
Having talked about their service before, tonight I'm going to talk about how the Civil War left them. Both suffered from afflictions common to soldiers during the Civil War, a war in which there were more casualties from disease than from combat. Charles Reed survived with chronic dysentery and all the afflictions that may accompany it, until 1920. He suffered pain and discomfort almost every day of that period of time. When he did die, it was in poverty and as a widow. His daughter Carrie Alice had taken care of him in his final years.
Matthew Hale Packard likewise suffered from chronic illnesses after the war. He did not last as long as Charles Reed, dying in 1881. Both of them were eventually left unable to work. Matthew Hale Packard's wife Emily Hoyt was able to earn a living as a milliner.
Aside from being the date of the start of the Civil War, April 12 is also the day the Russians launched Yuri Gagarin into space in 1961. It is also the day Franklin Delano Roosevelt died in 1945. I try to find something positive in the day, because April 12 is also my birthday.
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
